Testimony to City Council on "Optimal Staffing"

July 9, 2008

After the “optimal staffing” memo was distributed, the PPA met with the Chiefs office asking them to rescind the new policy. They refused. Not satisfied with that response, I sought assistance from the City Council. Randy Leonard was willing to help us. He met with Chief Berg last week and we believe they have a solution. We believe that they will provide $500,000 dollars for overtime to back-fill for personnel shortages. I went to City Council today to testify about our concerns about this and several other issues and to thank them for their willingness to find money for additional overtime dollars. Below is my testimony. I am hopeful they vote to approve the money soon. In the meantime if you are denied a vacation day let me know so the PPA can act.

City Council Testimony, Wednesday July 9, 2008 at 9:30

My name is Robert King and I am the President of the Portland Police Association. I am here to give you the lay of the land as to how things stand with your police officers.

I’ve been a police officer in Portland for 19 years. I can tell you honestly that I’ve never seen morale as low as it is at present. It’s the combination of a several things that has gotten us to this stage.

First it’s staffing. Cities of Portland’s size have, on the average, 2.5 officers per 1,000 citizens. In Portland, we’re well below 2.0 per thousand. We need to hire at least 300 officers to even approach appropriate staffing levels. When you add in the fact that we try to follow a community policing model that’s very officer-intensive, we’re out there every day trying to do too much with too few officers. Today, we only have 380 officers assigned to routine street patrol duties in a city that’s approaching a population of 600,000. Our officers are tired and they’re worn out.

Second, it’s pay. Every officer working for you knows about the recent Seattle police settlement that has Seattle officers receiving at least a 25% pay raise over a 4-year contract. That will put Seattle’s starting pay at $64,000 a year, and its top officer pay at $90,000. Portland will be more than $20,000 below these numbers. There have been several police wage settlements in the same range. Long Beach recently settled for a 24% pay raise, San Francisco for a 21% pay raise, Oakland for 22%, and Honolulu for 24%, all over four years. Phoenix just gave its officers a 13% raise over two years. Until recently Portland was the highest paid police agency in the state but this is no longer true and our members know it. We already can’t recruit enough officers, even after lowering our educational requirements; we’re facing a recruiting crisis in the future.

Lastly, we’ve had some serious working condition issues arising in the Bureau. We learned only 2 weeks ago that the Bureau was adopting what it called an “optimal staffing” program, something that really translated into denying officers many of the already limited vacation days they can take off in the summer. The Bureau didn’t involve us in any discussions of the issue, and we only found out about it after the fact when our officers started angrily calling us. We have approached the Bureau about making changes to improve working conditions like a sleep deprivation policy, fixing the court scheduling and notification system and dealing with the parking problem for central precinct officers, but no one has been willing to talk seriously with us about implementing these items.

All that to say we need your help and support, we know that you’re working on the vacation issue, and we appreciate your efforts on that front. We hope this effort signals a new willingness to listen, care and act to support us as we deliver critical police services to Portlanders. You have a brave, committed and professional men and women keeping our community safe but they need your support and encouragement at the highest possible levels. There’s a serious problem in the Bureau, and unless you act, it’s only going to get worse.

Victim of new "Optimal Staffing" policy?
Contact PPA office to challenge in legal forum

This letter to Chief Sizer outlines the concerns the PPA has with the recent implementation of new policy designed to save overtime dollars called “optimal staffing.” This letter was faxed and mailed to the Chief and also shared with the members of the PPA affected by it. Any PPA member denied vacation leave because of this policy is asked to contact the Union office so we can file grievances on your behalf.

July 1, 2008

Dear Chief Sizer,

I am writing to express my concerns with the new “optimal staffing” policy. It has landed with a thud in the five precincts. Officers see it as unfair and destructive. While the primary purpose of the policy is to save overtime dollars, to the extent it does so it is clearly at the expense of vacation leave for the officers working uniform patrol.

The policy will inevitably result in vacation leave being denied that would have previously been granted. It adds two layers of approval that are inconsistent with the long-standing past practice of granting vacation leave. It requires officers to justify why they want vacation leave, takes decision making out authority of the hands of supervisors and it requires officers to call in the same day they want off.

There was no discussion about this policy with the PPA before its implementation. I’ve now met with you and Chief Berg, and it is clear you are unwilling to rescind the memo and engage in further discussions about the policy and its impacts. I don’t want to be unclear on this. The PPA not only opposes the policy, but believes it is a violation of our contract. We are sharing this information with our membership and will file grievances if the policy is used to deny PPA members time off.

The new policy could not come at a worse time. Our staffing is well below the national standard, we have fallen behind in wages in the local and national labor market, and morale has sunk to the point that the last edition of the Rap Sheet focused largely on the declining mood of PPA members.

We expect you as the Police Chief to either demand the funding we need to operate the Bureau or refuse to provide services. Instead, the Bureau puts on the backs of rank-and-file members the responsibility for solving the City’s overtime spending problems. The new policy also disproportionately impacts patrol officers. We don’t understand why you would implement a policy that will likely harm patrol officers, the employees upon whom the City depends most for front-line law enforcement.

PPA members are frustrated with your decision to implement this policy, and the PPA will challenge it in every available legal forum.

Sincerely,
Robert J. King

Obama Campaign Apologizes

May 30, 2008

The recent visit of Presidential hopeful Senator Barack Obama brought out an estimated 70 thousand Portlanders to hear a message of hope. After the event, excitement and anticipation gave way to deep disappointment and sadness for Portland Police.

Following the event, photographs surfaced showing portable restrooms standing in the center of Portland’s Police Memorial at Waterfront Park. In the photos, the U.S. flag was still flying at half-mast following National Police Memorial Week. We could not understand how anyone could make such a basic error in judgment.

We couldn't believe anyone would intentionally dishonor the memory of our fallen officers. After making several calls it became clear that the Obama Campaign was ultimately responsible. We didn't want this incident to become partisan, we simply wanted an apology.

Last week we received that apology from the Obama Campaign in a letter saying, "When we learned about the Portland Police Memorial, we shared your disappointment and concern. We offer our deepest apologies to the Portland Police Department, the Portland Police Association, and the families and colleagues of those who have fallen in the line of duty."

To read the letter and press release in its entirety, click the link below.

Changes to RMT funding approved by PPA members

Changes to the Retirees Medical Trust's funding were approved by PPA members in a vote of 314 to 124. Members approved the proposal to direct 1.0% of the July 1, 2008 and July 1, 2009 COLA raises into the Trust.

Since establishment of the Trust in 2002, health care costs have risen sharply and PPA members are facing the reality of having to spend over $1,000 monthly just to maintain the same health insurance after retirement.